Webmaster

No hope of rolling back waterway cuts — Peterborough Examiner

 Major Issues, Trent-Severn Waterway  Comments Off on No hope of rolling back waterway cuts — Peterborough Examiner
May 312013
 
Peterborough Lift Locks

A group of business owners, local tourism industry representatives and municipal politicians met with the head of Parks Canada and Environment Minister Peter Kent in Ottawa on Thursday to encourage them to rollback cuts to the Trent-Severn Waterway.

They returned without much hope for changes to service levels season, said Trent Lakes Mayor Janet Clarkson, who led the trip from Buckhorn to Parliament Hill.

“We did a lot of talking. Maybe somebody listened,” she said Thursday.

Trent Lakes Township chartered the bus that took 21 people to Ottawa.

The group met with Haliburton-Kawartha Lakes-Brock MP Barry Devolin for about 45 minutes. During that time, Kent dropped by for about 10 minutes.

“The one commitment we got from (Kent) is that he said he’ll come down and take a tour of this end of the Trent,” Clarkson said.

When the group sat down with Parks Canada CEO Alan Latourelle later in the day, it learned there’s more service cuts than just during the shoulder seasons in the spring and fall, Clarkson said.

“They’re cutting back in July and August as well,” she said.

Instead of having crews at all locks, Trent-Severn Waterway is using roving teams that move between locks to let boat traffic travel through the system. It’s a cost-cutting measure. Devolin has said those cutbacks are just for the shoulder season when there’s less traffic, that the service would be ramped up for the busy summer period.

Clarkson said Latourelle indicated that’s not the case — the roving teams will be used for some of the locks during the summer.

“We’re going to have people bunching up and bunching up,” she said. “The boats are just going around in circles, there’s no place for them to tie up.”

Clarkson said the group presented suggestions such as implementing a boat licence sticker program that would charge $25 per sticker per year, which would be similar to vehicle licence stickers, as a way to raise more money.

And the group urged the government to start a national advertising campaign for the Trent-Severn Waterway similar to marketing that it has done for other national parks, Clarkson said.

“Is there any will in the federal government to make this thing survive at all?” she said. “They’ve slashed and burned the budget for tourism.”

READ THE ARTICE HERE

Peterborough Examiner

The Land Between

 News  Comments Off on The Land Between
Apr 302013
 
The Land Between

“The Land Between is a mosaic of unique spaces including small connected lakes, remarkable rivers, rare alvars, fens, rocky barrens, meadow marshes, woodlands, and scattered settlements. It has a fascinating history. It is a place of natural splendour and rich cultural heritage.

The Land Between is an outdoor enthusiast’s paradise. The goal of The Land Between program is to enhance the environmental, cultural and economic health and vitality of the region.”

http://www.thelandbetween.ca

Result of Delegation to County: We Get 30 Days!

 Major Issues, Quarries  Comments Off on Result of Delegation to County: We Get 30 Days!
Mar 092013
 
Dewdney's Cave

We took your concerns about the Dewdney Farms Quarry application and re-zoning to the Peterborough County Council Meeting for a final kick at getting someone to listen. Here is the summary. 

March 6th 2013 delegation to Peterborough County

COUNTY COUNCIL DELAYED DECISION FOR 30 DAYS.
….. Rubber-stamped it was not!

Members and associates of the NPLRA should be proud of the presentation Ross and Roger made Wednesday to the Peterborough County Council about issues surrounding the rezoning for the Dewdney Mountain farms from rural to industrial/aggreggate for the quarry. Council members appeared to be engaged and interested in the NPLRA’s message of concern.

Despite the time constraints, Ross and Roger made powerful statements about the NPLRA’s major points of concern:

1: The MNR overlooked the existence of the Dewdney caves, in-spite of its well documented location within 400 metres of the area of blasting.These caves could be the hibernation location of an endangered species of bat, which would require an ANSI study by the MNR to establish. When asked, the MNR stated in a letter it had no interest at this time.

2. In the reports to Council, there was no mention of the more than 500 folk that showed up at the June 23rd 2012 public meeting in Bobcaygeon. It only referred to the 28 speakers at that meeting.

3. With 335 pits and quarries in operation in the whole area and 4 in application stages, neither the MNR nor the local Council has any idea of the amount of tonnage permitted annually on the roads. The four pending applications are for unlimited tonnage! It was emphasized that we desperately need a cumulative haulage impact study.

4. Only 6 cents a ton is paid by the operators to the local municipalities for road repair, none by Crown Land operations. The Province gets .50 (fifty cents)/ton. The operators get $100-$140/ton on average profit.
Operators should be paying considerably more. Taxpayers should NOT be paying for wear and tear on the roads. The operators, including the Province in the case of being an operator should be paying.

5. Residents are seeing their property values decline, taxes increase, a high risk of adverse impact on surface and groundwater quality, interference with threatened,  endangered species and habitats, increased traffic congestion, road degradation,  road -safety concerns, increased air pollution, greenhouse gas emission due to increased truck traffic, impact on tourism resulting to adverse impacts on local and regional economy and increase level of noise and dust.

6.  Aboriginal rights may be affected by this decision, treaties are constantly being negotiated. Have the First Nations at Curve Lake been consulted?

All these issues show the inadequacy of the existing study methods and that the full information is not getting through to the decision makers.

————–

Council members had questions and showed concern for the issues. Although the NPLRA was not questioned directly but through Iain Mudd, of Landmark Association Ltd.,whose full report was presented after the Delegation,( and is featured with the agenda), there was good discussion on several of the issues:

Cavan Monaghan Deputy Mayor Scott McFadden lead the discussion about the Caves, saying he was not comfortable with the fact that the MNR had not visited the site before making the decision that they ( the caves) were not significant. As such he would not approve passing the application.

Several of the Council members agreed with Scott and a discussion ensued, ending with the decision to defer the re-zoning decision for 30 days to give the Council a chance to address the issue with the MNR.

North Kawartha Reeve Jim Whelan wanted council to approve the application saying that the studies had all been done and approved. He said this was a red herring.

Deputy Mayor of Smith-Ennismore – Lakefield Township, Andy Mitchell, commented that he was in agreement that the Quarry operators should be paying more for usage of the roads. There were several sounds of agreement to this statement.

______________

NPLRA’s purpose was to demonstrate that full and proper information was not getting to the decision makers, which could have flawed subsequent decisions. While this does not meet our hopes of better management and control of the Quarries at this time, this action to delay their decision comes as a huge encouragement, and shows that the County listens to and can hear our concerns.

The Aggregate Resources Act must be updated.

Our presence at the Peterborough Council meeting was noted by Warden Murray Jones. We had about 30 people there in a seating area of only 20! More chairs were brought out for us. This was good support from NPLRA members and associates as it was held in the day, in the middle of winter and In Peterborough!

Well done and thanks to everyone who showed up!

Quarry decision delayed over caves fears — Peterborough Examiner

 Major Issues, Quarries  Comments Off on Quarry decision delayed over caves fears — Peterborough Examiner
Mar 072013
 

County council wants more information on a network of caves near a planned quarry in Trent Lakes Township, about 45 kilometres north of Peterborough, before it gives a necessary planning approval for the venture.

Council decided Wednesday to delay a decision on the official plan amendment application for the Dewdney Mountain Farms Ltd. project in Trent Lakes (formerly known as Galway-Cavendish and Harvey).

It wants the Ministry of Natural Resources to answer questions about caves that are near the proposed site of the quarry.

READ THE ENTIRE ARTICE HERE

Peterborough Examiner

Quarry Meets County Council — CHEX Peterborough

 Major Issues, Quarries  Comments Off on Quarry Meets County Council — CHEX Peterborough
Mar 062013
 

“A concerned citizens group knows it can’t stop development of a proposed quarry in Trent Lakes Township. Still, the North Pigeon Lake Ratepayers Association [NPLRA] is not staying silent. Dan Nyznik reports.”

http://www.chextv.com/News/LN/13-03-06/Quarry_Meets_County_Council.aspx

CHEX Television

[embedplusvideo height=”500″ width=”630″ standard=”http://www.youtube.com/v/k0uWGCJihhY?fs=1&hd=1″ vars=”ytid=k0uWGCJihhY&width=630&height=500&start=&stop=&rs=w&hd=1&autoplay=0&react=1&chapters=&notes=” id=”ep9451″ /]

CHEX Peterborough

Notice of Delegation to County

 Major Issues, Quarries  Comments Off on Notice of Delegation to County
Feb 222013
 

NOTICE OF DELEGATION TO PETERBOROUGH COUNTY COUNCIL MARCH 6th
to demand responsible governance on issues regarding applications, operation, haulage and management of
QUARRIES

WEDNESDAY MARCH 6th at the
Peterborough County Council Offices
at 470 Water Street, Peterborough
9:30 AM

Please attend this Peterborough County Council Meeting to support this delegation by the North Pigeon Lake Ratepayers Assn. (NPLRA). It addresses the concerns of hundreds of local and seasonal families with regard to the apparent lack of proper consideration by our local and provincial governments for the accumulative effect of aggregate haulage, and the devastation this can cause to this beautiful area.

NPLRA will be requesting that proper studies are done and proper attention is given to safeguard the effects of hundreds of trucks a day on our roads, our property tax increases to repair these roads, property devaluation, environmental and lifestyle damage caused by ineffective management as well as non-effective rules & regulations in place at this time.

Your support at this meeting to hear the presentation of these concerns and question what actions the County intends to take to effectively address these issues, will show the depth of concern felt so strongly by our members, associated people and organizations.

PLEASE ATTEND. YOUR PRESENCE IS VITAL !!!

Notice of Delegation to County

 Major Issues, Quarries  Comments Off on Notice of Delegation to County
Feb 222013
 

NOTICE OF DELEGATION TO PETERBOROUGH COUNTY COUNCIL MARCH 6th
to demand responsible governance on issues regarding applications, operation, haulage and management of
QUARRIES

WEDNESDAY MARCH 6th at the
Peterborough County Council Offices
at 470 Water Street, Peterborough
9:30 AM

Please attend this Peterborough County Council Meeting to support this delegation by the North Pigeon Lake Ratepayers Assn. (NPLRA). It addresses the concerns of hundreds of local and seasonal families with regard to the apparent lack of proper consideration by our local and provincial governments for the accumulative effect of aggregate haulage, and the devastation this can cause to this beautiful area.

NPLRA will be requesting that proper studies are done and proper attention is given to safeguard the effects of hundreds of trucks a day on our roads, our property tax increases to repair these roads, property devaluation, environmental and lifestyle damage caused by ineffective management as well as non-effective rules & regulations in place at this time.

Your support at this meeting to hear the presentation of these concerns and question what actions the County intends to take to effectively address these issues, will show the depth of concern felt so strongly by our members, associated people and organizations.

PLEASE ATTEND. YOUR PRESENCE IS VITAL !!!

Letter to the Editor: What I learned From Council (2013-02-22)

 Major Issues, Quarries  Comments Off on Letter to the Editor: What I learned From Council (2013-02-22)
Feb 222013
 
Daily News

What I learned From Council

I never bothered too much with local politics in recent years having had my fill decades ago when developers and a “soft” township council threatened Boyd Island in Pigeon Lake. In the late spring of 2012 as the Ledge Road Quarry issue raised its ugly head I decided to sit in on some Galway-Cavendish and Harvey Council meetings to witness first hand the leadership and governance of our beautiful township. It was really worth the numerous visits for I learned the following:

  1. There are indeed expensive light bulbs. A debate over some $400 in light bulbs took considerably longer than any discussion of why a lawyer’s bill was for $35,000. Glad they are worried about every penny.
  2. A citizen must ask well in advance to ask a question or make a point at a Council session. A councillor, though, can raise, at any time, even personal issues. I learned that getting a reduce speed limit sign moved from in front of a councillor’s house is easy and minutes do not have to really be as accurate as the discussion or reason outlined at the Council meeting.
  3. An aggregate plan for the Township can be seen to be no more than a map of where all the aggregate rests. So thought one councillor. Must admit a one- page map in color does save on pages of verbiage that outlines the Township’s plan to manage the resource.
  4. Spending $28,000 a year for three years to study the waters of Pigeon Lake has no value since, after one-year post, the Scugog study the water looks the same! That, plus not wanting a conservation authority to have control, is enough to scuttle any hope of the Township getting involved.

I am so excited about learning even more in the next 22 months until we have a new group of councillors with their own lessons to teach.

Ross Morton
Resident on Pigeon Lake
“Stoned In Quarryville”

(Originally published in The Promoter, February 22, 2013)

Promoter, February 22, 2013

Promoter, February 22, 2013

Trent-Severn Waterway Update/Discussion

 Major Issues, Trent-Severn Waterway  Comments Off on Trent-Severn Waterway Update/Discussion
Feb 212013
 
Trent Severn Waterway

Trent Severn Waterway Update/Discussion MP Barry Devolin
February 15, 2013
Fenelon Falls Community Centre

There were 14 people present. Boat tour operators, Buckeye, 2 GCH Councillors, local business owners, associations.

1) Welcome from Barry Devolin, MP

2) Trent Severn Waterway Update – Barry Devolin, MP (BD)
BD gave a short oversight over the government structure leading to decision-making.
Parks Canada’s plan to combine TWS and Rideau Canal staff as one unit is well on its way.
TSW neglected for 30 years.
“It’s All About The Water” study (2007) is a well-rounded document. Some recommendations were followed, most recommendations very costly.
Sitting document!
There are operational and capital issues for the TSW. $400 mill estimated to fix those over the coming years.
BD is moderately optimistic on the capital side: After a chunk of concrete fell off a bridge in Montreal the government was forced to review all its capital assets, infrastructure. (Assess cost of lawsuits?)
An audit was done on the human cost of failure. (i.e. flooding – loss of lives).
This report is not public at the moment.
Government is working on a 10 – 20 year plan. Even though Ottawa is running a deficit the chance of capital improvements is now much more likely then 3 years ago.
Federal operating budget deficit of $50mill now down to $20 mill. After strategically cutting 7% across the board.
Fed. Gov. proposed 1600 draft measures; TSW is the only one getting relief. About 20% success.
Government now looking at revenue side.

Parks Canada cuts: canals took a disproportional hit.
Good news: back to normal season with regards to number of days.
Bad news: shorter hours of lock operation.
2013 ‘Flying squat’ lock management, 2 workers in a pickup truck going from lock to lock.
Q: will this actually work? Are there facilities, food, motels where the boats will be parked? Ottawa recognises that this will not be an easy transition.
This will go ahead. Councillor Ron mentioned that the trucks have already been purchased for the lock operators.
2013 mooring fees could change: principal idea is: charge market price, do not subsidise boaters.
2014 New lock fees.
Commercial operators: BD argues Parks Canada has the wrong reference points with regards to the fee structure for commercial operators. Is in communication with boat operators to learn about their schedules and problems, i.e. supper cruises at Peterborough lift lock affected by shortened hours of operation.
Levy for recreational boaters: many boats do not use the locks and their use of TSW needs to be accounted for.
BD – all 4 MPs prefer a growth model rather than the ‘choking’ model of Parks Canada.

Private members bill proposing a new management model for the TSW: MP Barry Devolin is still working at this. Needs to look at all canals operated in Canada that are currently operated by Parks Canada. Would like to introduce his bill as an example of what could be done. Would prefer separate, arms length entity to manage the canals. Parks Canada wants to preserve nature, communities are looking to bring in revenue, promote tourism and increase business through TSW.

3) Discussion/Question and Answer Period
Q: What is Parks Canada’s or Fed. Gov.’s 5/10-year vision for the TSW. Will the locks simply be closed in the future?
Who is the decision maker?
What is the actual cost of lock services versus water management?
Engage the whole community in the discussion about TWS.
Don’t incur cost for another study. ‘It’s All about the Water” is still relevant.
Utilize hydro electric.
Make better use of PC’s properties to increase revenue.
Great worry that locks will be shut down, loss of revenue, loss of property value.
How to impose boat fees.
Local Councils asking if waterfront property owners would agree to a property tax surcharge! (strongly opposed this). Sounds like less service, more taxes.
Cottage Associations, individuals, businesses should send a letter to the Prime Minister, Finance Minister, Minister of the Environment, cc MPs

4) Closing remark, Barry Devolin, MP
1. Local MPs are challenging ‘Flying Lock Services” and are asking that adjustments be made. Major of Trenton will drive this issue. (i.e. if a lockmaster is sick there will be no service, no facilities to use)
2. Will further discuss mooring issues for commercial vessels.
3.Will follow up on 5-year plan with Parks Canada. Understand short-term budget cuts, but what is the long-term plan?

5) Adjournment

Trent-Severn Waterways — Attention Boaters

 Major Issues, Trent-Severn Waterway  Comments Off on Trent-Severn Waterways — Attention Boaters
Feb 012013
 
Trent Severn Waterway

Parks Canada welcomes public input into the proposed increases in docking fees (2014) and mooring fees (2013).

Parks Canada canals are adopting a pay per use structure.

The proposed fee increase would address the annual cost to operate the locks.

Locks are classified Level 1 or 2 depending on services offered.

Changes of fee increases from $0.45/foot to $0.60foot (Level1), $0.90’foot(Level2) have been proposed  as well as increases to six-day-passes and seasonal passes.

Please visit their website and send your concerns and feedback by February 18, 2013 attention:
droits2013.2013fees@pc.gc.ca

Information from Parks Canada:
http://www.pc.gc.ca/eng/agen/tarifs-fees/consultation.aspx